| Posted By Dr. Sahib
Bleher
The Iranians may not even be aware
of it, but their hosting of the recent
Holocaust conference may prove to be
the most important milestone in their
history since the Islamic Revolution
under Khomeini. Western politicians
and media certainly grasped the
significance of the event, with
Germany's premier Merkel standing
shoulder to shoulder with prime
minister Olmert of the
"only-democracy-in-the-middle-east-that-is-not-a-democracy"
- the apartheid state of Israel - and
with BBC television news presenting
the bizarre spectacle of discussing,
rather than reporting on, an alleged
anti-Semitic conference whilst the
images in the background showed
traditionally clad Orthodox Jews
happily in attendance.
When the Islam-hating Western media
attacked the prophet Muhammad under
the pretence of freedom of speech,
Iran retaliateD by testing the limits
of those freedoms with its own
holocaust cartoon competition. In
doing so they stumbled across the most
jealously guarded dogma of secular
Western society, the Holocult.
Whereas questioning and reviling
religious beliefs is almost a
cornerstone underpinning the mindset
of those societies, even genuine
historical research into the subject
of a subsection of the 60 million who
died in the second world war is
prohibited and most certainly leads to
being ostracised in public: The
suffering of the Jews may not be
questioned since "if it were to
be proven that "The
Holocaust" has, in fact, been
stage-managed for political reasons in
order to promote Israeli interests,
then the State of Israel and the
United States as public players, and
the global Zionist organizations as
private lobbying entities would have
to accept their share of
responsibility for the damage,
suffering and hardship they have
wrought upon the Middle East and the
world and, accordingly, they should be
held accountable."
The latter is a quote from communiqué
no. 16 of Argentina's growing
opposition movement MSRA or Argentine
Second Republic Movement, who intend
to host a Holocaust conference of
their own in order to examine how the
Holocaust has been used
propagandistically for political ends
following the end of World War II.
Rather than a one-off event, the
Tehran conference is the beginning of
the unravelling of the special status
that Israel and Zionist Jews enjoy in
the world justified by their special
suffering at the hands of the Germans.
The issue is not whether Jews suffered
during World War II but that this
suffering has been exploited since, in
what Finkelstein called the
"Holocaust Industry".
For the last half century, only Jews
and retired politicians, the latter in
their memoirs, were permitted to voice
criticism of Israel and the Zionist
lobby. Meanwhile, with some historical
distance, many more people are
demanding to have a say in the matter,
although others, like the Muslim
American Society (MAS) Freedom
Foundation, feel the need to curry
favour by stating "True Muslims
must never deny the Holocaust"
and in the words of Ibrahim Ramey, the
Director of their Human and Civil
Rights Division: "The evidence of
this crime, and the horrible magnitude
of this killing, is irrefutable. From
sources as varied as Nazi war records,
film documentation, and most
importantly, the testimony of
survivors and witnesses, we know that
the mass murder of European Jews was,
indeed, the single greatest crime of
genocide in the twentieth
century." - whereas the communiqué
from Argentina questions why, if World
War II cost more than 60 million lives
in Europe and Asia, mankind's
attention is almost solely focused on
the suffering of 10% of those victims
and millions have been added since
then "including almost 2 million
Iraqis killed by the Bush Family and
their Associates since the First Gulf
War in 1991 to date".
Recognising that the label of unique
suffering can no longer be worn
unchallenged, researchers who
questioned certain aspects of the
official holocaust story were
convicted in political show trials as
a warning to others: in France Robert
Faurisson or Roger Garaudy, the latter
for his substantive book The Founding
Myths of Modern Israel, in Austria
David Irving, in Australia Fredrick
Toeben, in Germany Germar Rudolf and
Ernst Zundel. But with Iran
state-sponsoring a conference on the
subject and inviting eminent Rabbis to
attend, all this effort has come to
naught. The topic will not go away and
awkward questions are going to be
asked.
As a gentile European I may not ask
these questions without penalty, but
Rabbi Moishe Arye Friedman, chief
Rabbi of the Orthodox anti-Zionist
Jewish Community in Vienna, Austria,
did not prostrate before the God of
Zion and did not hesitate to attend
the Tehran conference decried by the
Muslim American Society as immoral and
motivated by racial hatred. In his
address to the conference he stated
that the founder of the Zionism,
Theodor Herzl, already spoke in his
first diaries of a number of six
million Jews who were allegedly
threatened in Europe and that,
according to Herzl, the so-called
Jewish state would only have a chance
if there was a disaster for these six
million European Jews, as well as that
the Bolshevists and the British
government already used the six
million figure in their war propaganda
against Germany during the first world
war. He further talked about the
collaboration between the Nazis and
the Zionists, and added that he was
sure that the last word about the real
or actual number of the victims had
not yet been spoken, mentioning that
in 1990 the number originally
specified of four million victims of
Auschwitz had been reduced to
approximately 900,000 to 1.1 million
whilst the six million figure remained
unchallenged.
Now to be consistent, Austrian
prosecutors would have to charge the
Vienna Chief Rabbi with Holocaust
denial, but such a trial would further
dent the credibility of the laws
protecting the official version of
events as well as that of the Shoah
story itself, repeatedly embellished
by Hollywood productions. It is,
therefore, highly unlikely, that the
Rabbi will be dragged before a court
to answer on charges of anti-Semitism.
Meanwhile there are two strands to the
unofficial debate about the holocaust:
on the one hand historians demand that
this episode of history must not be
barred from proper scientific scrutiny
in order to separate myth from
reality. Guiseppe Furioso, for
example, asks why there is no
documentary evidence of the gassings
nor any mention of it in Churchill's
memoirs or by any other political
figures of the time.
The other, and more potent, strand is
the questioning of the Pax Americana
or victor's justice established with
the Nuremberg Trials and the
propagandistic exploitation of Jewish
suffering for imperial ends. Just as
president Ahmedinejad of Iran
convincingly argues that if the
Germans tried to exterminate the Jews
then they should be responsible for
resettling them in their own country
rather than making the Palestinians
pay the price, others, like the
Argentineans, point out that powers
like Israel who stole Palestinian land
and the United States of America who
stole Native Indian land have no moral
authority to play world policemen in
the name of the International
Community.
The tide is changing and the
Argentinean press release points to
the fact that its effect is not lost
on the pro-Zionist camp:
"Interestingly", it says,
"the Zionist pro-Israeli
mainstream media implicitly admits
that any such investigation poses a
grave danger to Zionism.
Amidst all the insults and threats
from such newspapers like the Los
Angeles Times, in their 13-Dec-06
issue however, they ran an article
called Holocaust denial can be
dangerous" which concludes by
saying that, "...attacking the
legitimacy of the Holocaust allows...
(attacking) the legitimacy o Israel,
which was created by the United
Nations as a result of the Holocaust.
If the first act didn't happen, then
the second act wasn't necessary."
In a way this let the cat out of the
bag. Israel's days are numbered if the
last great "religious" taboo
of not discussing the true facts and
dimensions of the holocaust is broken,
and with the dollar in accelerating
decline and US marines taking a
beating in Iraq, Iran - threatened
with a pre-emptive strike by the
United States for alleged nuclear
weapons of mass destruction - seems to
have successfully managed to cut the
Achilles heel of the current
Anglo-Zionist world order.
Fly
With Flying Imam
<>
TrueTranslation
by
Dr.
Sahib M Bleher,
a
professor of linguistics and
translation, member of the Chartered
Institute of Linguists <>
Books
& Audio
|
