|
Salam
Fayyad: Israel's Man in Palestine - Evaluating PA
Authority under Abbas and Fayyad
14 January 2011 By Stephen
Lendman
His resume includes a University
of Texas economics Ph.D., a teaching position at
Jordan's Yarmouk University, and economic research at
the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank. From 1987 - 1995,
he also served as a World Bank and IMF official, and
until 2001, was IMF's man in Palestine, serving as
Yasser Arafat's finance minister.
In Palestine's 2006 legislative
elections, his Third Way party got 2.4% of the votes,
a clear renunciation. Yet after Fatah's coup d'etat
co-opted the PLO, PA and West Bank, President Mahmoud
Abbas illegitimately appointed him prime minister.
The New York Times calls him "a
political independent who gained the confidence of the
West and is largely respected in Israel." In fact,
he's a political opportunist, Israel's man in
Palestine. Also Washington's. The Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace's Nathan J. Brown calls him
"indispensable to US diplomacy....confusing a useful
individual with sound policy." He's mainly improved
security, providing enforcer services for Israel
against his own people.
Moreover, there's "no separation
of powers; instead there is an increasing
concentration of authority in the executive branch.
There is no legislative branch. Court orders have been
ignored; judges have bowed out of sensitive political
issues; and the independence of the judiciary is
hardly guaranteed. The fact remains, of course,
that....security is synonymous with the attempt to
suppress Hamas" and other opposition groups.
Senior officials, including Abbas
and Fayyad, have neglected or unilaterally decreed
other measures. As CEO, Fayyad has maintained earlier
institutions and made a few of them more efficient.
"But he has done so in an authoritarian context that
robs the results of domestic legitimacy." As appointed
prime minister, of course, he has no legitimacy beyond
Israeli and Washington power backing him.
Writer Nathan Thrall says he's
"criticized at home for many of the same reasons he is
lauded abroad." He condemns violence against Israel,
ignores Palestinian persecution, is instrumental in
furthering it, and says diaspora Palestinians can
resettle in a future Palestinian state, not Israel or
their settlements, exceeding 40% of the West Bank and
East Jerusalem.
Backing him is a 25,000-strong
security force, trained, equipped, vetted and perhaps
run by America's Lt. General Keith Dayton, US security
coordinator (USSC) for Israel and the PA. Under his
command, thousands of Palestinians complete 19 weeks
of training at Jordan's International Police Training
Center, built with US funds in 2003 to instruct Iraqi
police.
Throughout the West Bank,
Dayton's in charge of building and renovating
garrisons, training colleges, Interior Ministry
facilities, and security headquarters. In recent
years, Washington has spent around $400 million to
institutionalize hard-line control, supplementing
Israel's own efforts.
Fayyad is titular CEO under Abbas.
According to Michael Oren, Israel's US ambassador,
"....expanding what Dayton is doing in the security
realm to other sectors of Palestinian governance and
society is really the only viable model for progress."
"Progress," of course, is repressive military
occupation, no opposition allowed.
Evaluating PA
Authority under Abbas and Fayyad
In a December 20 article, titled
"The Palestinian Authority and the Problem of Reform
under the Occupation," Dr. Moshen Mohammed Saleh asked
if it's possible. "Or is (it) simply a matter of
'dancing to the Occupation's tune?"
Indeed the latter after Arafat's
Oslo Accords abdication. He ignored core issues,
including Palestinian sovereignty, fixed borders,
settlement expansions, the right of return, ending
Israel's occupation, and establishing a unified
government for all Palestinians.
"In short," said Saleh, "the way
(the PA) was established looked more like a 'trap'
than a solution or a way out; and the route it took
was more akin to wandering aimlessly in a 'labyrinth'
than walking naturally and logically towards
independence....The current situation (resembles a
prison under an) assigned warden" empowered to enforce
repression for disobedience.
The PA/PLO-led Fatah "found
itself alone facing widespread opposition from nearly
10 Palestinian factions," notably Hamas. "As a result,
the institutions of the Authority were mainly staffed
by" Fatah members or supporters, including "shameless
opportunists and exploiters" like Abbas and Fayyad. As
CEO, Fayyad represents Israel and the West, "demand(ing)
full concessions from Palestinians" with nothing
committed in return.
"Moreover (his) government paid
heavy political prices (for) committ(ing) itself (to)
cracking down upon Hamas and other Palestinian
resistive factions as well as neutralizing" the
legislative assembly's role. His survival, fact,
depends on sustaining divisions and no unified
Palestinian platform.
On December 28, Saleh again
evaluated Fayyad and his government in an analysis
titled "Evaluating Salam Fayyad's government in
Ramallah," saying:
It's sustained by maintaining
Palestinian divisions and keeping Israeli, Washington,
and Arab leadership support. Fatah's leadership also
backs him, yet he's "exploited his position so as to
channel funds to his government and thereby
consolidate his political base."
At the same time, he and Abbas
renounced armed resistance, instead adopting
"reconciliation with Israel as (their) project." On
June 17, 2007, his new government included himself as
prime minister, 11 ministers, two independent
politicians and another technocrat besides himself, a
trained economist. All opposition ministers were
excluded.
Then on July 13, 2007, Abbas
raised the ministerial total to 16, including Fayyad.
On January 22, 2009, Fayyad created a new government
under Abbas. By May, it had 24 ministers, mostly
technocrats. Opposition factions, excluding Hamas,
were represented by one minister each. The Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) refused
to participate. The entire process lacked legitimacy.
Abbas bypassed legalities "by legislating by decree,"
letting "Fayyad's government....operate (by)
presidential mandate."
In fact, "this government, which
is supposed to represent the will of the people,
vigorously opposed the political party (Hamas) which
democratically represents the will of the majority,
(and has) legally been entrusted with the mandate to
represent them."
For his part, Fayyad's management
style has been devisive. He's excluded many Fatah
members from civil service and security force
positions, coerced some into retirement, and appointed
others "ideologically close to him" to key posts.
Moreover, he's monopolized financial resources for his
own purposes, and remains subservient to Israel and
Washington against the interests of his own people.
Opposition Fatah members face
exclusion. As a result, some, like Minister for
Jerusalem Affairs Hatem Abdel Qader, resigned "with
criticism of the government for its failings." In
virtually all respects, Israel has control, including
over economic issues, unjustly restricting Palestinian
imports and exports, as well as imposing "restrictions
and impediments on the free movement of people and
goods."
Absent Abbas/Fayyad opposition,
Israel also expropriates Palestinian land, expands
settlements, extends its Judaization agenda, consumes
most West Bank resources, especially water, and
maintains hard-line control together with
Dayton-trained forces.
As a result, from June through
August 2007 alone, West Bank Hamas members were
subjected to 1,007 attacks, both by security forces
and Fatah members. They "included 639 arrests and
kidnappings, thirty-six (shooting) incidents....and
175 assaults on institutions and organizations,
including centers of Qur'anic learning, charitable
organizations, media institutes, press offices,"
nursery and other schools. In addition, 156 raids
targeted private properties belonging to Hamas and
supporters.
Thereafter, thousands more Hamas
members and facilities were targeted. Hundreds of
arrests were made, and numerous demonstrations and
protests against occupation, Gaza's siege, and
Israel's Separation Wall were attacked. Fayyad
dutifully enforces Israel's no opposition policy.
Israeli forces, of course, do much of it themselves.
A Final Comment
As prime minister, Fayyad's
future depends on satisfying two masters, Israel and
Washington, their divide and conquer agenda,
solidifying occupation, continuing settlement
expansions, entirely Judaizing Jerusalem, dominating
the West Bank's economy, and containing all opposition
factions.
A Palestinian future, however,
depends on ending Israel's occupation, achieving
unity, fulfilling real sovereignty under a government
serving them, and an integrated Palestine or one
nation serving all its citizens equitably, fairly and
democratically. That vision, however, remains nowhere
in sight, Fayyad and Abbas in charge to keep it that
way.
Stephen Lendman lives in
Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and
listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished
guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the
Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central
time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs
are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add
Comments |